The EFM Feature

wahoo!
NANCY adds: What does it say about me that I half-expected that hyperlink to take me here?
Dedicated reader Anna from Tennessee writes:

I’m thrilled about the Court ruling. I LOVE that’s it’s making all the candidates come out on the abortion issue. Romney’s line sounds the most conservative–it’s a “step.” Love it!

CHARLES adds: And from reader Adam:

I’m not sure if you’ve read Justice Ginsburg’s dissent from todays decision regarding partial-birth abortions. In part, she says, “A decision so at odds with our jurisprudence should not have staying power.”
If anyone thinks it is not important what kind of judges a candidate would nominate, they’re kidding themselves. Justice Ginsburg is basically saying she won’t treat this decision as precedent. I don’t support using abortion as a test to determine whom to nominate, but I have no problem with nominating judges who will interpret the constitution as it was written, not as they want it to be written. Out of McCain, Giuliani, and Romney, Romney’s the only one I think I can trust to nominate judicially conservative (as opposed to politically conservative) judges.

About Charles Mitchell

EFM's resident Yankee, Charles Mitchell, works in the non-profit arena in his native Pennsylvania. He and his wife, Charissa, live near the state capital of Harrisburg with their daughter, Adeline, and are members of a congregation of the Presbyterian Church in America.

Comments and Discussion

Evangelicals for Mitt provides comments as a way to engage in a public and respectiful discussion about articles and issues. Any comment may be removed by the editors for violating common decency or tempting flames.

Comments are closed.