The EFM Feature

Perhaps because I am also reading a Jaffa book, I found Matthew Franck’s NRO post on Mayor Giuliani and the op-ed Steve mentioned to be quite interesting. Here is an excerpt:

There’s a lot to like about Rudy Giuliani on other grounds. And this isn’t 1860, when there was just one issue in the election. Still, I’m reminded of what Harry Jaffa says (in his great book on Lincoln, A New Birth of Freedom) of a moment in the late 1850s when some in the Republican Party dallied with the idea of making the Illinois Democrat Stephen A. Douglas its standard-bearer. Douglas was to slavery then what Giuliani is to abortion now—the “don’t care” man, who declared that it mattered not to him which way people voted on slavery in the territories, just as Rudy shrugs at either outcome the next time Roe is tested in the Supreme Court. As Jaffa puts it in describing this crisis moment for the Republicans and the country then:

The Declaration of Independence as the “sheet anchor of American republicanism” would have been abandoned, to be replaced by popular sovereignty. There would have been no Gettysburg Address to memorialize the Founding in the minds of American citizens. Lincoln’s argument that the principles of the Declaration contained a promise to all men everywhere would have perished from the earth. What would have made the Union worth saving in such a case is hard to imagine.

At this moment it was essential for Lincoln, the party, and the country that he make Douglas unacceptable to the Republicans. For the future of the right to life, it may be equally essential that Giuliani be made unacceptable to today’s Republican Party. Eric Johnston, I’m afraid, has his political calculus exactly backwards.

About Charles Mitchell

EFM's resident Yankee, Charles Mitchell, works in the non-profit arena in his native Pennsylvania. He and his wife, Charissa, live near the state capital of Harrisburg with their daughter, Adeline, and are members of a congregation of the Presbyterian Church in America.

Comments and Discussion

Evangelicals for Mitt provides comments as a way to engage in a public and respectiful discussion about articles and issues. Any comment may be removed by the editors for violating common decency or tempting flames.

Comments are closed.