The EFM Feature

Over at Commentary, Jonathan Tobin asserts that Mitt can’t run against ObamaCare:

The fact is any Republican who wins the presidential nomination next year will have to run against Obama on health care. To comprehend that basic fact of contemporary political life is to understand why Romney has little or no chance of being the nominee.

Let’s put aside for the moment the importance that Tobin seems to place on health care compared to the economy.  (After all, if unemployment is still around 9% at the beginning of next year and growth remains anemic, what will be the dominant theme of the campaign?)  Is he right?  Can Mitt not run against Obama on health care?

I’d be lying if I said that it won’t be a hurdle for him to overcome in the primary, but as I’ve argued elsewhere, his health care experience will be an asset in the general election.  Mitt can credibly argue that his own expertise with the mandate shows that it can’t work everywhere, that his state’s own experiences with costs show that it grows far more costly the greater the percentage of uninsured, and that it makes little sense to treat Massachusetts like Arkansas like California.

Moreover, he recently articulated what he’d do to ObamaCare starting “day one” of his presidency.  In that sense, he’s already running against ObamaCare.  And at some point his rivals will have to address Mitt’s actual position rather than simply sneering at RomneyCare — especially since Pawlenty, Huntsman, and Gingrich all indicated openness to at least state-level mandates during their own careers.  (Given the conservative origins of much of RomneyCare, that’s hardly surprising.  It’s only in the last 24 months that a state-level mandate has been an anathema in conservative politics.)

There are precious few viable candidates who represent the Perfect Conservative.  Everyone has baggage.  Everyone.  I’d argue that as the race matures and as we get a complete picture of Mitt’s opponents (right now, we’re still in the phase where some still lift their eyes to the hills hoping to see the conservative messiah galloping in on a white horse), we’ll realize that Mitt will have to be beaten by a person, not just an issue.


Comments and Discussion

Evangelicals for Mitt provides comments as a way to engage in a public and respectiful discussion about articles and issues. Any comment may be removed by the editors for violating common decency or tempting flames.

2 Responses to Can Romney Run Against ObamaCare?

  1. Liz says:

    You watch: Obama will run against Obamacare, and he will need to in order to get re-elected. I really don’t see Romney’s adamant opposition to socialized medicine as a hindrance to Mr. Romney. And for those who say Romney lacks “authenticity”, I would submit that when over half the country clamored to see his birth certificate, one could argue that Obama lacked authenticity to the extreme. My point is that, when you’re running against an Obama, it is hard to appear too indecisive, too hypocritical, too unqualified. Sad, but true.

  2. FAB807 says:

    David is absolutely correct! I could not have said it better! Also, the syndicated columnist, Kathleen Parker, wrote an article recently (May 16/17 2011) taking the position that “RomneyCare is NOT ObamaCare.” (She probably plagerized — I mean — “borrowed” some of your thoughts and ideas David!!) Not to mention the Heritage Foundation article/report (April 2006) expounding the virtues of Mitt’s “bipartisan” (emphasis added) healthcare overall — using “free market [principles] in healthcare…” As it only took 4 years of Jimmy Carter to give us 8 great years of Ronald Reagan — history’s tendancy or repeating itself , hopefully holds true here! — 4 years of Obama economic nightmare in contrast to Jimmy Carter — will lead to 8 great years of Mitt Romney. Need I say more?!!

Leave a Reply to Liz Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>