Stay tuned for links to my analysis of the Obamacare decision, but today would be an ideal day to step up and donate to Mitt. We can send a message with our wallets. Today, I’m giving the maximum personal donation, and I’m glad to do it.
Evangelicals for Mitt provides comments as a way to engage in a public and respectiful discussion about articles and issues. Any comment may be removed by the editors for violating common decency or tempting flames.
3 Responses to The Stakes of the Election Just Got Higher
It seems to me the individual mandate is the least offensive of the provisions of Obamacare. I haven’t been able to look at the opinion yet, but what other provisions were debated and decided? I keep hearing that the individual mandate is the primary provision that the opinion addresses. David, in your NRO article, you argued that the individual mandate was not a major concern and it was a good thing about Romneycare, and I would agree. Perhaps the idea of the individual mandate isn’t the problem, but the scope of application (state vs. federal).
By David French
Today is a sad, sad day. We really need to pray for our country now more than ever.
It seems to me the individual mandate is the least offensive of the provisions of Obamacare. I haven’t been able to look at the opinion yet, but what other provisions were debated and decided? I keep hearing that the individual mandate is the primary provision that the opinion addresses. David, in your NRO article, you argued that the individual mandate was not a major concern and it was a good thing about Romneycare, and I would agree. Perhaps the idea of the individual mandate isn’t the problem, but the scope of application (state vs. federal).
I am referring to the article “Supporting RomneyCare, Opposing ObamaCare” on 02 Mar 12. If I misunderstood your argument, please clarify.Thanks!